4.8 Article

Role of different pathways of the complement cascade in experimental bullous pemphigoid

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 116, Issue 11, Pages 2892-2900

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI17891

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI025011, R01 AI061430, R29 AI040768, R01 AI040768, AI25011, AI61430, AI40768] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR32081, R01 AR032599, K01 AR052109, AR052109, R01 AR032081, AR32599, R37 AR032081] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease associated with autoantibodies directed against the hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and BP230 and inflammation. Passive transfer of antibodies to the murine BP180 (mBP180) induces a skin disease that closely resembles human BP. In the present study, we defined the roles of the different complement activation pathways in this model system. Mice deficient in the alternative pathway component factor B (Fb) and injected with pathogenic anti-mBP180 IgG developed delayed and less intense subepidermal blisters. Mice deficient in the classical pathway component complement component 4 (C4) and WT mice pretreated with neutralizing antibody against the first component of the classical pathway, C1q, were resistant to experimental BP. These mice exhibited a significantly reduced level of mast cell degranulation and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) infiltration in the skin. Intradermal administration of compound 48/80, a mast cell degranulating agent, restored BP disease in C4(-/-) mice. Furthermore, C4(-/-) mice became susceptible to experimental BP after local injection of PMN chemoattractant IL-8 or local reconstitution with PMNs. These findings provide the first direct evidence to our knowledge that complement activation via the classical and alternative pathways is crucial in subepidermal blister formation in experimental BP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available