4.5 Article

Solving SAT and SAT modulo theories:: From an abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure to DPLL(T)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACM
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 937-977

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/1217856.1217859

Keywords

theory; verification; SAT solvers; Satisfiability Modulo Theories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We first introduce Abstract DPLL, a rule-based formulation of the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) procedure for propositional satisfiability. This abstract framework allows one to cleanly express practical DPLL algorithms and to formally reason about them in a simple way. Its properties, such as soundness, completeness or termination, immediately carry over to the modern DPLL implementations with features such as backjumping or clause learning. We then extend the framework to Satisfiability Modulo background Theories (SMT) and use it to model several variants of the so-called lazy approach for SMT. In particular, we use it to introduce a few variants of a new, efficient and modular approach for SMT based on a general DPLL(X) engine, whose parameter X can be instantiated with a specialized solver Solver(T) for a given theory T, thus producing a DPLL(T) system. We describe the high-level design of DPLL(X) and its cooperation with Solver(T), discuss the role of theory propagation, and describe different DPLL(T) strategies for some theories arising in industrial applications. Our extensive experimental evidence, summarized in this article, shows that DPLL(T) systems can significantly outperform the other state-of-the-art tools, frequently even in orders of magnitude, and have better scaling properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available