4.5 Review

Meta-analysis of the effect of exercise interventions on fitness outcomes among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 111-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.03.033

Keywords

exercise; meta-analysis; diabetes mellitus; physical fitness

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01NR07870] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review applied meta-analytic procedures to integrate primary research that examined exercise fitness outcomes among adults with type I or type 2 diabetes. We used extensive literature searching strategies to locate published and unpublished intervention studies that tested exercise interventions. We conducted meta-analytic procedures using both fixed- and random-effects models. Analyses were conducted separately for type I and type 2 diabetes and separately for two-group and single-group data under two assumptions about pre-post fitness outcomes association: no association and a strong positive association (0.80). Codable data were extracted from 35 reports with 1074 subjects. The type I diabetes overall weighted mean effect size for two-group comparisons was 0.65. For treatment group pretest versus post-test, the effect was 0.62. The effect size among adults with type 2 diabetes for two-group comparisons was 0.35. The treatment group pretest versus post-test comparison effect was 0.37. Effect sizes among control group participants were not statistically different from 0. For type 2 diabetes two-group comparisons, larger effect sizes were associated with exercise prescription, fitness testing, supervised exercise, group sessions, and recommendations for longer duration exercise sessions. HbA1c, age, body mass index, and gender distribution were unrelated to fitness outcomes, (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available