4.1 Article

A comparison of total, respirable, and real-time airborne particulate sampling in horse barns

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 599-605

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15459620600948557

Keywords

aerosols; agriculture; dust; direct-reading instruments; horse; particulate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of total, respirable, and real-time airborne particulate were obtained in 12 horse barns in summer and winter. Respirable and total particulate concentrations were measured gravimetrically; real-time particulate was measured with an aerosol photometer. Total particulate (TP) ranged from nondetectable (ND) to 2.1 mg/m(3) and from ND to 1.2 mg/m(3) for winter and summer sampling, respectively. Respirable particulate ( RP) ranged from ND to 0.2 mg/m(3) and from ND to 0.7 mg/m(3) for winter and summer measurements, respectively. The mean respirable fraction of particulate for summer and winter measurements was 0.63 and 0.34, respectively Real-time particulate (RTP) concentration was significantly correlated with TP for winter measurements and for pooled data but was not significantly correlated with RP for winter, summer, or pooled measurements. Peak, 10-sec average levels of RTP were estimated to range up to 22 mg/m(3) in the samples collected. The data suggest that (a) airborne particulate concentrations and particle size distributions vary considerably among horse barns, and (b) real-time sampling, with an aerosol photometer, may be a more reliable measure of airborne TP than airborne RP in these environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available