4.6 Article

Subepithelial myofibroblasts are novel nonprofessional APCs in the human colonic mucosa

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 9, Pages 5968-5979

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5968

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 55783, DK 56338] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human gastrointestinal mucosa is exposed to a diverse normal microflora and dietary Ags and is a common site of entry for pathogens. The mucosal immune system must respond to these diverse signals with either the initiation of immunity or tolerance. APCs are important accessory cells that modulate T cell responses which initiate and maintain adaptive immunity. The ability of APCs to communicate with CD4(+) T cells is largely dependent on the expression of class II MHC molecules by the APCs. Using inummohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry, we demonstrate that a-smooth muscle actin', CD90' subepithelial myofibroblasts (stromal cells) constitutively express class II MHC molecules in normal colonic mucosa and that they are distinct from professional APCs such as macrophages and dendritic cells. Primary isolates of human colonic myofibroblasts (CMFs) cultured in vitro were able to stimulate allogeneic CD4(+) T cell proliferation. This process was dependent on class II MHC and CD80/86 costimulatory molecule expression by'the myofibroblasts. We also demonstrate that CMFs, engineered to express a specific DR4 allele, can process and present human serum albumin to a human serum albumin-specific and DR4 allele-restricted T cell hybridoma. These studies characterize a novel cell phenotype which, due to its strategic location and class H MHC expression, may be involved in capture of Ags that cross the epithelial barrier and present them to lamina propria CD4(+) T cells. Thus, human CMFs may be important in regulating local immunity in the colon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available