4.7 Article

QTL analysis for capsaicinoid content in Capsicum

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 113, Issue 8, Pages 1481-1490

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0395-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 08500] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pungency or heat found in Capsicum fruit results from the biosynthesis and accumulation of alkaloid compounds known as capsaicinoids in the dissepiment, placental tissue adjacent to the seeds. Pepper cultivars differ with respect to their level of pungency because of quantitative and qualitative variation in capsaicinoid content. We analyzed the segregation of three capsaicinoids: capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin and nordihydrocapsaicin in an inter-specific cross between a mildly pungent Capsicum annuum 'NuMex RNaky' and the wild, highly pungent C. frutescens accession BG2814-6. F-3 families were analyzed in three trials in California and in Israel and a dense molecular map was constructed comprised mostly of loci defined by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Six QTL controlling capsaicinoid content were detected on three chromosomes. One gene from the capsaicinoid biosynthetic pathway, BCAT, and one random fruit EST, 3A2, co-localized with QTL detected in this study on chromosomes 3 and 4. Because one confounding factor in quantitative determination of capsaicinoid is fruit size, fruit weight measurements were taken in two trials. Two QTL controlling fruit weight were detected, however, they did not co-localize with QTL detected for capsaicinoid content. The major contribution to the phenotypic variation of capsaicinoid content (24-42% of the total variation) was attributed to a digenic interaction between a main-effect QTL, cap7.1, and a marker located on chromosome 2 that did not have a main effect on the trait. A second QTL, cap7.2 is likely to correspond to the QTL, cap, identified in a previous study as having pronounced influence on capsaicinoid content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available