4.5 Article

Reduction of crying episodes owing to infantile colic: a randomized controlled study on the efficacy of a new infant formula

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 1304-1310

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602457

Keywords

infantile colic; partially hydrolysed milk formula; prebiotics; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on crying episodes owing to infantile colic of a new infant formula containing partially hydrolysed whey proteins, prebiotic oligosaccharides (OS), with a high beta-palmitic acid content. Design: Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting: Italy. Subjects: Two hundred and sixty-seven formula-fed infants, aged less than 4 months, with infantile colic, were randomized to receive either the new infant formula (study treatment (ST)) or a standard formula and simethicone (6 mg/kg twice a day) (control treatment (CT)). A questionnaire was given to parents to evaluate for 14 days the daily number of colic episodes and crying time. Results: Out of the 199 infants who completed the study, 96 were treated with the new formula and 103 were not treated. Infants receiving the new formula had a significant decrease in colic episodes after 1 week (2.47 +/- 1.94 at day 7 vs 5.99 +/- 1.84 at the study entry) compared to infants receiving the CT (3.72 +/- 1.98 at day 7 vs 5.41 +/- 1.88 at the study entry) (P < 0.0001). Also at day 14, the crying episodes were significantly different between the two groups of infants (1.76 +/- 1.60 in ST vs 3.32 +/- 2.06 in CT) ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The use of a partially hydrolysed formula supplemented with fructo- and galacto-OS induces a reduction of crying episodes in infants with colic after 7 and 14 days when compared with a standard formula and simethicone. Sponsorship: The study was supported by funds from Numico, Italy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available