4.4 Article

Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape

Journal

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 11, Pages 974-995

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.04.012

Keywords

average enamel thickness; relative enamel thickness; enamel cap area; dentine area; enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) length; EDJ shape; fossil hominids; hominoids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines cross-sections of molar crowns in a diverse modern human sample to quantify variation in enamel thickness and enamet-dentine junction (EDJ) shape. Histological sections were generated from molars sectioned buccolinguatty across mesiat cusps. Enamel cap area, dentine area, EDJ length, and bicervical diameter were measured on micrographs using a digitizing tablet. Nine landmarks along the EDJ were defined, and X and Y coordinates were digitized in order to quantify EDJ shape. Upper molars show greater values for the components of enamel thickness, leading to significantly greater average enamel thickness than in tower molars. Average enamel thickness increased significantly from M1 to M3 in both molar rows, due to significantly increasing enamel cap area in upper molars, and decreasing dentine area in lower molars. Differences in EDJ shape were found among maxillary molars in combined and individual populations. Sex differences were also found; mates showed significantly greater dentine area, EDJ length, and bi-cervicat diameters in certain tooth types, which resulted in females having significantly thicker average enamel. Differences in enamel thickness and EDJ shape within molars were also found among populations, although few consistent trends were evident. This study demonstrates that enamel thickness and EDJ shape vary among molars, between sexes, and among populations; these factors must be considered in the categorization and comparison of ape and human molars, particularly when isolated teeth or fossil taxa are included. Human relative enamel thickness encompasses most values reported for fossil apes and humans, suggesting limited taxonomic value when considered alone. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available