4.2 Article

Impact of caloric intake on parenteral nutrition-associated intestinal morphology and mucosal barrier function

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 474-479

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0148607106030006474

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI044076] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is known to induce villus atrophy, epithelial cell (EC) apoptosis, and increase mucosal permeability. The study hypothesized that increasing amounts of energy delivery to mice would result in the best outcome, with the least effects on the mucosa. Methods.- Mice were randomized to enteral controls (saline infusion with ad libitum enteral food) or to 1 of 3 PN groups (with no enteral nutrition): full (100% of daily average energy intake for the mouse), reduced (75% of energy intake) or very low (50% of energy intake). Mice received PN for 7 days. Mucosal morphology, EC apoptosis, and bacterial translocation wore assessed. Resulis: Villus height decreased significantly with decreasing levels of caloric intake and was significantly lower in all PN groups compared with controls. Body weight loss was significantly greater in PN groups vs controls and was greatest in mice with the lowest caloric delivery. A consistent trend toward a higher EC apoptotic index with decreasing caloric intake was observed, and apoptosis in all PN groups exceeded controls (2-fold). All PN groups demonstrated greater bacterial translocation than controls. Conclusions: PN induces intestinal EC apoptosis and villus and crypt atrophy, even at 100% of predicted energy needs, and such changes increased with greater reduction of energy intake. This study supports a concept that lack of enteral nutrition, rather than absolute caloric levels, is responsible for many of the adverse effects of PN. The study also allows the investigators to better optimize a mouse model of PN delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available