4.8 Article

Stable HepG2- and Huh7-based human hepatoma cell lines for efficient regulated expression of infectious hepatitis B virus

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 636-645

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.019

Keywords

HBV; HBV cell line; HBV drug screening; Tet-regulated HBV; Tet-regulated hepatoma cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cannot be propagated in cultured cells but two human hepatoma cell lines, HepG2 and Huh7, support virus replication when transfected with HBV DNA. If standardization is required stably transfected cell lines provide distinct advantages. One such line, HepG2.2.15, is widely used in antiviral research but HBV production is limited and difficult to control. Our aim was to establish stable, inducibly HBV producing HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines that overcome these limitations. Methods: Based on the tetracycline (Tet)-regulated TetOFF system, a Tet-responsive promoter-controlled HBV genome was introduced into separately established, well-regulatable HepG2 and Huh7 lines expressing Tet-responsive trans-activators (tTAs). Stable clones were analyzed for regulatability and levels of HBV expression, quality of the virus produced, and responsiveness towards antivirals. Results: HepG2- and Huh7-based cell lines were established which, Tet-controllably, produce more HBV than HepG2.2.15 cells. The secreted virions were infectious for primary tupaia hepatocytes, and the cell lines responded as well as HepG2.215 cells to different antivirals. Conclusions: The new HBV cell lines should be valuable tools for academic and pharmaceutical HBV research. The parental tTA-cells will facilitate the generation of additional lines, producing HBV variants, or other genes, in an identical host cell background. (c) 2006 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available