4.3 Article

Fast quantification of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with artificial neural networks

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 110-122

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.08.004

Keywords

magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; artificial neural networks; radial basis function neural network; parametric spectral analysis

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR019186, S10 RR19186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB002095, EB02095] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate quantification of the MRSI-observed regional distribution of metabolites involves relatively long processing times. This is particularly true in dealing with large amount of data that is typically acquired in multi-center clinical studies. To significantly shorten the processing time, an artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach was explored for quantifying the phase corrected (as opposed to magnitude) spectra. Specifically, in these studies radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) was used. This method was tested on simulated and normal human brain data acquired at 3T. The N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr), choline (Cho)/Cr, glutamate + glutamine (Glx)/Cr, and myo-inositol (mI)/Cr ratios in normal subjects were compared with the line fitting (LF) technique and jMRUI-AMARES analysis, and published values. The average NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr and mI/Cr ratios in normal controls were found to be 1.58 +/- 0.13, 0.9 +/- 0.08, 0.7 +/- 0.17 and 0.42 +/- 0.07, respectively. The corresponding ratios using the LF and jMRUI-AMARES methods were 1.6 +/- 0.11, 0.95 +/- 0.08, 0.78 +/- 0.18, 0.49 +/- 0.1 and 1.61 +/- 0.15, 0.78 +/- 0.07, 0.61 +/- 0.18, 0.42 +/- 0.13, respectively. These results agree with those published in literature. Bland-Altman analysis indicated an excellent agreement and minimal bias between the results obtained with RBFNN and other methods. The computational time for the current method was 15 s compared to approximately 10 min for the LF-based analysis. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available