4.3 Article

Twenty-year audit of percutaneous liver biopsy in a major Australian teaching hospital

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 692-U2

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01216.x

Keywords

liver biopsy; percutaneous; complication; abnormal coagulation; audit; outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To examine the changes in indications, patient characteristics, safety and outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous core liver biopsies in a major Australian teaching hospital over a period of two decades. Methods: A retrospective audit was carried out on all percutaneous core liver biopsies from a single institution between 1996 and 2005. This was combined with 10 years of data already reported on for the years 1986-1995 to detect trends in indications and outcomes. Results: Medical records from 1398 patients were included for analysis. Over a 20-year period, the most common indications for liver biopsy were hepatitis C (37.8%), hepatitis B (26.4%) and abnormal liver function tests (22.2%). Twelve major complications (1.0%) were seen; 10 episodes of haemorrhage, 1 bile leak and 1 visceral perforation. Seven of these patients had an abnormal baseline coagulation profile; a significant risk for major haemorrhage (P < 0.001), resulting in three deaths. All deaths occurred in inpatients with major comorbidities. Minor complications occurred in 13.6% of patients, with multiple passes a significant risk factor. Whereas the overall major and minor complication rates were independent of operator experience inadequate specimens were more frequently obtained by the registrar. Conclusion: This large series extending over two decades shows that despite advances in biopsy techniques, the rates of both minor and major complications remain significant. Of particular concern are the procedure-related deaths. Identifying factors that may increase risk requires further scrutiny and careful patient selection needs to be undertaken.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available