4.6 Review

Thematic review series: Systems biology approaches to metabolic and cardiovascular disorders - Network perspectives of cardiovascular metabolism

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 2355-2366

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R600023-JLR200

Keywords

mitochondria; glycolysis; glycogenolysis; energy channeling; compartmentalization; heart; ischemia; cardioprotection; systems biology; dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, we examine cardiovascular metabolism from three different, but highly complementary, perspectives. First, from the abstract perspective of a metabolite network, composed of nodes and links. We present fundamental concepts in network theory, including emergence, to illustrate how nature has designed metabolism with a hierarchal modular scale-free topology to provide a robust system of energy delivery. Second, from the physical perspective of a modular spatially compartmentalized network. We review evidence that cardiovascular metabolism is functionally compartmentalized, such that oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogenolysis preferentially channel ATP to ATPases in different cellular compartments, using creatine kinase and adenylate kinase to maximize efficient energy delivery. Third, from the dynamics perspective, as a network of dynamically interactive metabolic modules capable of self-oscillation. Whereas normally, cardiac metabolism exists in a regime in which excitation-metabolism coupling closely matches energy supply and demand, we describe how under stressful conditions, the network can be pushed into a qualitatively new dynamic regime, manifested as cell-wide oscillations in ATP levels, in which the coordination between energy supply and demand is lost. We speculate how this state of metabolic fibrillation leads to cell death if not corrected and discuss the implications for cardioprotection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available