4.1 Article

Modeling of regional high ozone episode observed at two mountain sites (Mt. Tai and Huang) in East China

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 253-272

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10874-006-9038-6

Keywords

high ozone episode; NAQPMS; regional transport; backward trajectories; the Yangtze Delta; the East Central China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high O-3 episode was observed during 23-25 May 2004 at two high-mountain sites reflecting the regional pattern of air pollutants over East China. This episode lasted about three days with the maximum hourly O-3 mixing ratios reaching 111 and 114 ppbv at Mt. Tai and Huang, respectively. Backward trajectories and meteorological analysis indicated that regional transport, associated with a weak high pressure system over the East China Sea, might play an important role in the formation of this high ozone episode. The nested air quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) was applied to investigate the formation and evolution of this high O-3 event. The comparison of model results with observations showed that NAQPMS successfully reproduced the main observed patterns of O-3 and meteorological parameters during the simulated period. The model results with emission over the Yangtze Delta and the East Central China switched on/off clearly showed that ozone and its precursors transported from the Yangtze Delta and the East Central China enhanced the high ozone episode at two sites, with a contribution of 20%-50% during the episode. In addition, based on process analysis with the model, chemical production and regional transport appeared to be the main causes of high ozone episode involving a large amount of high-ozone air masses and precursors transported from the surrounding areas. The horizontal transport is more active during the period of high ozone episode than that during the non-episode at Mt. Tai as well as Mt. Huang.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available