4.5 Article

Differential effects of agarose and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) on dendritic cell maturation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 79A, Issue 2, Pages 393-408

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30798

Keywords

combination products; biomaterial; adjuvant; dendritic cells

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [1R01EB004633-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Application of biomaterials in combination products in which the biomaterial is presented to the host with a biological component prompts the need for understanding the biomaterial-associated adjuvant effect in the immune response against antigens associated with such a product. We have previously demonstrated that a polymer commonly used in tissue engineering and vaccine delivery, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), exerts an adjuvant effect in vivo, which was supported by PLGA-induced dendritic cell (DC) maturation in vitro. In this study, the effects of agarose and PLGA on DC maturation were compared in vitro to establish differential biomaterial effects. Human monocyte-derived DCs were treated with agarose or PLGA microparticles or films, and their maturation effect was measured as expression of costimulatory and MHC class II molecules, allostimulatory capacity, and proinflammatory cytokine secretion. Direct comparison of DC maturation phenotype indicated that PLGA was a stronger stimulus of DC maturation than agarose, and this maturation was not affected by microparticle phagocytosis. However, agarose-treated DCs showed higher activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) 24 h after the initial stimulation of DCs. Taken together, these results demonstrate differential biomaterial effects on DC maturation, substantiating the maturation effect of PLGA, and provide screening methods for biomaterial adjuvant effect for applications in combination products. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available