4.6 Article

Influence of transglutaminase-induced cross-linking on properties of fish gelatin films

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 9, Pages E376-E383

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00191.x

Keywords

cross-linking; edible film; fish gelatin; fish gelatin films; microbial transglutaminase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fish gelatin (FG) is a potential alternative to current mammalian (beef and pork) gelatin. However, its physical and thermal properties limit its use in many applications. The treatment of microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) on FG could be a practical way to increase the use of FG films in various applications. Physical properties, barrier properties, and molecular weight change of FG films were measured. The viscosity of the MTGase-treated FG solution significantly (P < 0.05) increased from 6.81 +/- 0.65 cP to 35.04 +/- 3.59 cP as the reaction time and concentration of MTGase increased. After employing 2% of MTGase into FG solution, the tensile strength increased from 48.03 +/- 5.45 MPa to 68.00 +/- 1.9 MPa, while percent elongation decreased from 13.1% +/- 2.90% to 1.47% +/- 0.05%. Oxygen barrier property was significantly (P < 0.05) increased from 7.24 +/- 1.48 cc(.)m/m(2.)d to 17.69 +/- 3.08 cc(.)m/m(2.)d, while water vapour permability was not statistically (P < 0.05) different. The melting temperature (T-m) measured by differential scanning calorimetry increased from 124.78 +/- 1.98 degrees C to 158.49 +/- 2.68 degrees C as the enzyme reaction time increased. The color values of L*, a*, and b* were changed from 95.56 +/- 0.09 to 95.50 +/- 0.06, from -0.17 +/- 0.01 to -0.23 +/- 0.00, and from 3.17 +/- 0.04 to 3.47 +/- 0.09, respectively. The opacity significantly (P < 0.05) increased from 1.43% +/- 0.32% to 2.87% +/- 0.06%. SDS-PAGE results showed that the molecular weight of fish gelatin films increased when the MTGase reaction takes place.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available