4.7 Article

Adaptation of the quality by design concept in early pharmaceutical development of an intranasal nanosized formulation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 491, Issue 1-2, Pages 384-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.06.018

Keywords

Quality by design; Regulatory pharmacy; Meloxicam nanoparticles; Early development QbD; Risk assessment; Nasal administration

Funding

  1. [TAMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulatory science based pharmaceutical development and product manufacturing is highly recommended by the authorities nowadays. The aim of this study was to adapt regulatory science even in the nano-pharmaceutical early development. Authors applied the quality by design (QbD) concept in the early development phase of nano-systems, where the illustration material was meloxicam. The meloxicam nanoparticles produced by co-grinding method for nasal administration were studied according to the QbD policy and the QbD based risk assessment (RA) was performed. The steps were implemented according to the relevant regulatory guidelines (quality target product profile (QTPP) determination, selection of critical quality attributes (CQAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs)) and a special software (Lean QbD Software (R)) was used for the RA, which represents a novelty in this field. The RA was able to predict and identify theoretically the factors (e.g. sample composition, production method parameters, etc.) which have the highest impact on the desired meloxicam-product quality. The results of the practical research justified the theoretical prediction. This method can improve pharmaceutical nano-developments by achieving shorter development time, lower cost, saving human resource efforts and more effective target-orientation. It makes possible focusing the resources on the selected parameters and area during the practical product development. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available