4.4 Article

Gene targeting of Cdc42 and Cdc42GAP affirms the critical involvement of Cdc42 in filopodia induction, directed migration, and proliferation in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 4675-4685

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0466

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA105117, CA105117] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL085362, R01 HL085362] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies in Cdc42 knockout mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and ES-derived fibroblastoid cell lines raise concern on a body of literature derived by dominant mutant expression approach in a variety of cell lines implicating mammalian Cdc42 as a key regulator of filopodia induction, directional migration and cell cycle progression. To resolve the physiological function of mammalian Cdc42, we have characterized the Cdc42(-/-) and Cdc42GAP(-/-) primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) produced by gene targeting as the Cdc42 loss- or gain-of-activity cell model. The Cdc42(-/-) cells were defective in filopodia formation stimulated by bradykinin and in dorsal membrane ruffling stimulated by PDGF, whereas the Cdc42GAP(-/-) cells displayed spontaneous filopodia. The Cdc42 loss- or gain-of-activity cells were defective in adhesion to fibronectin, wound-healing, polarity establishment, and migration toward a serum gradient. These defects were associated with deficiencies of PAK1, GSK3 beta, myosin light chain, and FAK phosphorylation. Furthermore, Cdc42(-/-) cells were defective in G1/S-phase transition and survival, correlating with deficient NF-kappa B transcription and defective JNK, p70 S6K, and ERK1/2 activation. These results demonstrate a different requirement of Cdc42 activity in primary MEFs from ES or ES-derived clonal fibroblastoid cells and suggest that Cdc42 plays cell-type-specific signaling roles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available