4.7 Article

Assessing nigrostriatal dysfunctions by pharmacological MRI in parkinsonian rhesus macaques

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 636-643

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.004

Keywords

amphetamine; apomorphine; phMRI; rhesus macaque; Parkinson's disease; MPTP

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG 13494] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH01245] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39787, P50 NS039787] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New imaging techniques are needed to longitudinally monitor the development, progression and treatment of Parkinson's disease. The present study was designed to test whether the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response to dopaminergic stimulation as measured by pharmacological MRI (phMRI) correlated to specific histological and behavioral features of the parkinsonian state. Nine adult rhesus monkeys were rendered hemiparkinsonian by intracarotid administration of MPTP. Three months after MPTP treatment, the trained, MRI-adapted awake animals were scanned with a phMRI technique while being administered a presynaptic (D-amphetamine) or post-synaptic (apomorphine) dopamine stimulating agents. The primary findings were (1) the putamen and substantia nigra (SN) but not the caudate nucleus displayed significant BOLD responses to these dopaminergic drugs; (2) a significant relationship was found between amphetamine-evoked activation and the number of surviving dopamine neurons in the SN, which was also correlated with bradykinesia; and (3) inverse relationships were seen in response to apomorphine and amphetamine stimulation between the MPTP-lesioned and unlesioned putamen and SN. The results suggest that phMRI may prove useful for longitudinally monitoring the progression and treatment of PD. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available