4.5 Article

Prediction of treatment response by HPA-axis and glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms in major depression

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1154-1163

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.08.001

Keywords

major depression; prediction; DEX/CRH test; glucocorticoid receptor; polymorphism; paroxetine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We investigated whether treatment response is predicted by hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis parameters, or by genetic polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), that regulates its feedback. Methods: Ninety-eight outpatients completed 8 weeks of paroxetine treatment. Treatment response was defined as a 50% decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (HRSD) ratings. At baseline, 24h urinary cortisol excretion, and cortisol and ACTH concentrations in a DEX/CRH test were measured. The presence of polymorphisms in the GR DNA sequence (Bcll, ER22/23EK, N363S) was determined. Prediction of treatment response was analysed by calculating response rates per tertile of an HPA-axis parameter and per GR genotype. Results: The response rate in the high ACTH tertile was significantly tower as compared to the intermediate tertile, but not compared to the tow tertile (response rates from high to Low tertile: 33%, 67% and 42%). Carriers of the BclI polymorphism had higher ACTH values than non-carriers (baseline ACTH: 3 versus 5 ng/l, p = 0.02) and showed a trend towards tower decrease of HRSD rates than non-carriers (HRSD decrease: 8 versus 11, respectively, p = 0.07). In a subgroup of BclI carriers, patients in the high ACTH tertile had a lower decrease in HRSD and tower response rates than patients in the tow ACTH tertiles (HRSD decrease from high to low tertile: 5, 9 and 11, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The results suggest that hyperactivity of the HPA-axis predict worse treatment outcome. The BclI polymorphism explains, in part, DEX/CRH test results and tends to be associated with worse treatment outcome. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available