4.5 Article

Raman spectroscopy of benzenethiolates on nanometer-scale gold clusters

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 110, Issue 44, Pages 22166-22171

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp062840r

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-infrared (1064-nm) irradiation of neat solid samples of benzenethiolate monolayer-protected gold clusters (MPCs) yields strong, well-resolved Raman spectra of the thiolate groups, comparable to those obtained for the same groups adsorbed at roughened gold electrodes. These clusters are formulated as TOA(Z)[Au-N(SPh)(M)](Z-), N >> M and Z=3- 6, with core diameters of 1.7 and 1.5 nm, and were characterized previously by X-ray scattering, mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, optical spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, and elemental analysis [Price, R. C.; Whetten, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005]. Numerous previous attempts to obtain spectra on various MPCs yielded only diffuse luminescence bands, as did benzenethiolate MPC samples of TOA(2)[Au-44(SPh)(28)](2-), with 1.1-nm core diameters. The clusters are free of excess tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOABr) from the synthetic procedure, containing only the necessary TOA(+) to maintain charge balance. In situ thermometry, using the anti-Stokes/Stokes intensity ratios, indicated the sample temperature remained below the onset of thermal decomposition. The Raman spectra of the clusters bear a strong resemblance to those obtained for nonmetallic ((AuSPh)-S-(I))(x) polymer samples that are not in resonant absorption at the laser wavelength. The smaller of the two cores, nominally TOA(6)[Au-110(SPh)(62)], shows clearly a band at 505 cm(-1) assigned to a S-S stretch, suggestive of a moiety resembling diphenyl disulfide on the cluster surface. These results are interpreted with reference to recent reports suggesting a substantial reconstruction of the outermost gold layer upon thiolate adsorption (SAM formation).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available