4.6 Article

Quantifying the importance of the atmospheric sink for polychlorinated dioxins and furans relative to other global loss processes

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 111, Issue D21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006923

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous attempts to establish global mass balances for polychlorinated dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs) have focused on the terrestrial sink, thereby neglecting deposition to the oceans and atmospheric losses. In this study, the atmospheric sink of polychlorinated dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs) was calculated on the basis of their presence in soils. OH radical ([OH]) depletion reactions compete with atmospheric deposition fluxes for the fate of atmospheric PCDD/Fs. Three different steady state scenarios were considered: scenario A was a one-box atmosphere with globally averaged [OH], temperature (T), atmospheric lifetime (t(life)), and a constant gas-particle partitioning (Phi); in scenario B, [OH], T, and Phi were averaged in a multibox atmosphere, with a constant tlife; and in scenario C, tlife was varied. In scenario A the strength of the atmospheric sink was 2400-2800 kg/yr; in scenario B it was similar to 2100 kg/yr; in scenario C, it was similar to 1,800 kg/yr (t(life) = 5.4 days) to similar to 2,800 kg/yr (t(life) = 14 days). The majority of the atmospheric sink was due to the depletion of Cl(4)DFs (1300-1400 kg/yr), followed by Cl(4)DDs (360-380 kg/yr) and Cl(5)DFs (230-240 kg/yr). On a global scale, major sinks for PCDD/Fs are the deposition to terrestrial soils and the oceans. For Cl(6-8)DDs, deposition to soils outweighs depletion reactions in the atmosphere and ocean uptake. The more volatile Cl4-5DD/Fs, however, are true multimedia'' compounds, with their estimated atmospheric sink being roughly as important as the terrestrial sink (in the case of Cl5DD/Fs) or outweighing it (e.g., Cl4DD/Fs).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available