4.4 Article

Thermal Stabilities of brain spectrin and the constituent repeats of subunits

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 45, Pages 13670-13676

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi061368x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL031579, HL31579] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK026263, P01 DK032094, DK 26263, R37 DK026263, DK 32094] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The different genes that encode mammalian spectrins give rise to proteins differing in their apparent stiffness. To explore this, we have compared the thermal stabilities of the structural repeats of brain spectrin subunits (alpha II and beta II) with those of erythrocyte spectrin ( RI and, I). The unfolding transition midpoints (T-m) of the 36 alpha II- and, beta II- spectrin repeats extend between 24 and 82 degrees C, with an average higher by some 10 degrees C than that of the alpha I- and, beta I- spectrin repeats. This difference is reflected in the T-m values of the intact brain and erythrocyte spectrins. Two of three tandem-repeat constructs from brain spectrin exhibited strong cooperative coupling, with elevation of the T-m of the less stable partner corresponding to coupling free energies of approximately -4.4 and -3.5 kcal/mol. The third tandem-repeat construct, by contrast, exhibited negligible cooperativity. Tandem- repeat mutants, in which a part of the linker helix that connects the two domains was replaced with a corresponding helical segment from erythroid spectrin, showed only minor perturbation of the thermal melting profiles, without breakdown of cooperativity. Thus, the linker regions, which tolerate few point mutations without loss of cooperative function, have evidently evolved to permit conformational coupling in specified regions. The greater structural stability of the repeats in alpha II- and, beta II- spectrin may account, at least in part, for the higher rigidity of brain compared to erythrocyte spectrin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available