4.7 Article

Dosing schedules of 6-month regimens and relapse for pulmonary tuberculosis

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200605-637OC

Keywords

logistic models; relapse; risk factors; treatment; tuberculosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: The optimal approach for reducing tuberculosis relapse is open. Objectives: We examined the possibility of reducing relapse by increasing dosing schedules. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials involving adult cohorts with pulmonary tuberculosis treated using 6-mo rifamycin-containing regimens, which were grouped under seven categories ordered by dosing schedules. Assuming cavitation and positive 2-mo culture were the driving forces for relapse, a static deterministic model apportioned observed numbers with and without relapse in each cohort into eight subgroups. Combining subgroups stratified by cavitation, 2-mo culture, and regimens enabled estimation of adjusted relapse risks. chi(2) Tests for trend and logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between relapse and dosing schedules. Results: We identified 200 cases of bacteriologic relapse out of 5,208 patients in 32 cohorts. A logistic risk model showed a significant dose-response relationship between dosing schedules and relapse, with the following odds (95% confidence intervals) of relapse relative to daily regimens: 1.6 (0.6-4.1) for daily initial phase (113) plus thrice-weekly continuation phase (CP), 2.8 (1.3-6.1) for daily IP plus twice-weekly CP, 2.8 (1.4-5.7) for thrice-weekly, 5.0 (2.4-10.5) for daily IP plus once-weekly rifapentine, and 7.1 (3.3-15.3) for thrice-weekly IP plus once-weekly rifapentine. In the presence of cavitation, only 6-mo daily or daily IP plus thrice-weekly CP attained best-estimated relapse risks below 5%; they reached 6% when 2-mo culture was also positive. Conclusions: Cavitary tuberculosis is best treated with 6-mo regimens comprising daily IP and thrice-weekly CP, which may be extended when 2-mo culture is positive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available