4.7 Article

Mutation of JAK2 in the myeloproliferative disorders:: timing, clonality studies, cytogenetic associations, and role in leukemic transformation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages 3548-3555

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-013748

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0300497] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [088340] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0300497] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0300723B, G0300497] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of an acquired mutation of JAK2 in patients with myeloproliferative disorders has raised questions about the relationship between mutation-positive and mutation-negative subtypes, timing of the JAK2 mutation, and molecular mechanisms of disease progression. Here we demonstrate that patients with V617F(-) essential thrombocythemia do not commonly progress to become V617F(+). Consistent with the concept of distinct pathogenetic mechanisms, we show that patients with and without the JAK2 mutation have different patterns of cytogenetic abnormality, with virtually all patients carrying the 20q deletion or trisomy 9 being V617F(+). We also investigated the existence of a pre-JAK2 phase by comparing the proportion of clonally derived granulocytes, estimated from X-chromosome inactivation patterns (XCIPs), with the proportion of V617F(+) granulocytes. Our results demonstrate that inherent XCIP variability between granulocytes and T cells produces a systematically biased pattern of results that may be misinterpreted as evidence for an excess of clonally derived granulocytes, an observation that limits the utility of XCIP analysis in this context. Lastly, we studied 4 patients with V617F(+) myeloproliferative disorders who subsequently developed acute myeloid leukemia. In 3 patients the leukemic cells were V617F(-), suggesting that in these patients the leukemia arose in a V617F(-) cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available