4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Lanreotide autogel every 6 weeks compared with lanreotide microparticles every 3 weeks in patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors - A phase III study

Journal

CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages 2474-2481

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22272

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors; lanreotide Autogel; microparticles; somatostatin analogues

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The noninferiority of a 6-week dosing schedule of lanreotide Auto-gel (Lan ATG) at a dose of 120 mg compared with a 3-week dosing schedule of lanreotide microparticles (Lan MP) at a dose of 60 mg was investigated in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). METHODS. Patients who had sporadic, well differentiated NET with a low grade of malignancy were recruited for this open-label, Phase 111, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 deep subcutaneous injections of Lan ATG (120 mg, every 6 weeks) or 6 intramuscular injections of Lan MP (60 mg, every 3 weeks). Tumor markers, tumor size, and symptoms were assessed between baseline and Week 18. Success was classified as a response that ranged from disappearance to an increase < 25% in tumor marker, tumor size, or symptom frequency. RESULTS. Sixty patients were randomized, and 46 patients completed the study. Both for tumor markers and for tumor size, Lan ATG was not inferior to Lan MP (55% and 59% of patients responded on tumor markers, respectively; 68% and 66% of patients responded on tumor size, respectively). There were too few symptomatic patients to compare carcinoid symptoms. Both treatments were tolerated well, and no safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS. Lan ATG at a dose of 120 mg every 6 weeks was as effective for controlling NET as Lan MP at a dose of 60 mg every 3 weeks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available