4.6 Article

Temporal and spatial changes of permafrost in Canada since the end of the Little Ice Age

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 111, Issue D22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JD007284

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] Climate warming was significant from the mid-19th century to the mid-20th century and in recent decades at most northern high latitudes. Climate warming could induce permafrost degradation, which may have important impacts on hydrological, ecological, and biogeochemical processes and on northern communities and infrastructure. To assess the effects of climate change on permafrost, a process-based model of Northern Ecosystem Soil Temperature ( NEST) was developed and utilized to simulate the ground thermal regime of the Canadian landmass at a resolution of a half-degree latitude-longitude since the end of the Little Ice Age ( circa 1850). The simulated southern boundary of the permafrost for recent decades is similar to that of the current published map, and the simulated active layer thickness and the depth to permafrost base are comparable to site measurements. Simulation results show that climate change since the end of the Little Ice Age, especially during the 20th century, has induced degradation of permafrost in most of Canada: From the 1850s to the 1990s, the area underlain by permafrost was reduced by 5.4%; for those areas where permafrost existed in all the years throughout the period 1850 - 2002, the mean depth to the base of permafrost decreased ( became shallower) by 3 m; the mean active layer thickness increased by 0.21 m, or 34%; and the mean depth to permafrost table increased by 0.39 m. Results also show that suprapermafrost taliks were formed and became larger and more frequent with climate warming in the southern permafrost region, which greatly enhanced permafrost thaw from the top and could have severe impacts on the landscape, hydrology, and ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available