4.8 Article

Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 314, Issue 5802, Pages 1113-1118

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1131412

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG002772, R01 HG002772-01, R01 HG002772-1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL066681] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [F32 GM074367, 1-F32-GM074367] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our knowledge of Neanderthals is based on a limited number of remains and artifacts from which we must make inferences about their biology, behavior, and relationship to ourselves. Here, we describe the characterization of these extinct hominids from a new perspective, based on the development of a Neanderthal metagenomic library and its high-throughput sequencing and analysis. Several lines of evidence indicate that the 65,250 base pairs of hominid sequence so far identified in the library are of Neanderthal origin, the strongest being the ascertainment of sequence identities between Neanderthal and chimpanzee at sites where the human genomic sequence is different. These results enabled us to calculate the human-Neanderthal divergence time based on multiple randomly distributed autosomal loci. Our analyses suggest that on average the Neanderthal genomic sequence we obtained and the reference human genome sequence share a most recent common ancestor similar to 706,000 years ago, and that the human and Neanderthal ancestral populations split similar to 370,000 years ago, before the emergence of anatomically modern humans. Our finding that the Neanderthal and human genomes are at least 99.5% identical led us to develop and successfully implement a targeted method for recovering specific ancient DNA sequences from metagenomic libraries. This initial analysis of the Neanderthal genome advances our understanding of the evolutionary relationship of Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis and signifies the dawn of Neanderthal genomics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available