4.7 Article

Radiation from an expanding cocoon as an explanation of the steep decay observed in GRB early afterglow light curves

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 652, Issue 1, Pages 482-489

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/507595

Keywords

gamma rays : bursts; gamma rays : theory; plasmas; radiation mechanisms : nonthermal; radiative transfer; X-rays : bursts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of early afterglow emission from gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the Swift satellite show steep decay of the X-ray light curve, F-v(t) proportional to t(-alpha), with alpha approximate to 2.5-4 at similar to 300-500 s after the burst trigger. The spectrum in this time interval is consistent with a spectrum Fv proportional to v(-beta) with beta approximate to 1. Here we show that these results can be explained as due to emission from the hot plasma cocoon'' associated with the jet, which expands relativistically after the jet has broken through the stellar envelope, if a substantial fraction of the cocoon kinetic energy is dissipated at scattering optical depths tau(T) similar to 102-103. This results in the bulk of the cocoon photons being observed at X-ray energies, after a delay of a few hundredseconds relative to the gamma-ray photons from the jet. Multiple Compton scattering inside the cocoon cause a spread in the arrival times of the X-ray photons. We calculate numerically the observed light curve of photons emerging from the cocoon and show that it exhibits a steep decay, which resembles that observed in many GRB afterglows. During the adiabatic expansion that follows the dissipation phase, photons lose energy to the expanding plasma, and as a result, the emerging photon energy distribution differs from a blackbody spectrum and can be approximated as a power law in the Swift XRT band. Comparison of the numerical results with the Swift XRT data of GRB 050315 and GRB 050421 shows good agreement between the light curves and spectra during the initial steep decay phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available