4.7 Article

Comparing dynamical and photometric mass estimates of low- and high-redshift galaxies: Random and systematic uncertainties

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 652, Issue 1, Pages 97-106

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/508128

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determine the importance of redshift-dependent systematic effects in the determination of stellar masses from broadband spectral energy distributions (SEDs), using high-quality kinematic and photometric data of early-type galaxies at z similar to 1 and z similar to 0. We find that photometric masses of z similar to 1 galaxies can be systematically different, by up to a factor of 2, from photometric masses of z similar to 0 galaxies with the same dynamical mass. The magnitude of this bias depends on the choice of stellar population synthesis model and the rest-frame wavelength range used in the fits. The best result, i.e., without significant bias, is obtained when rest-frame optical SEDs are fitted with models from Bruzual & Charlot. When the SEDs are extended to the rest-frame near-IR, a bias is introduced: photometricmasses of the z similar to 1 galaxies increase by a factor of 2 relative to the photometric masses of the z similar to 0 galaxies. When we use the Maraston models, the photometric masses of the z similar to 1 galaxies are low relative to the photometricmasses of the z similar to 0 galaxies by a factor of similar to 1.8. This offset occurs both for fits based on rest-frame optical SEDs and fits based on rest-frame optical+near-IR SEDs. The results indicate that model uncertainties produce uncertainties as high as a factor of 2.5 in mass estimates from rest-frame near-IR photometry, independent of uncertainties due to unknown star formation histories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available