4.8 Article

Emergence of primate genes by retrotransposon-mediated sequence transduction

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603224103

Keywords

gene duplication; SVA; retrotransposition; mobile element

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM59290, R01GM45668, R01 GM059290, R01 GM045668] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene duplication is one of the most important mechanisms for creating new genes and generating genomic novelty. Retrotransposon-mediated sequence transcluction (i.e., the process by which a retrotransposon carries flanking sequence during its mobilization) has been proposed as a gene duplication mechanism. L1 exon shuffling potential has been reported in cell culture assays, and two potential L1-mediated exon shuffling events have been identified in the genome. SVA is the youngest retrotransposon family in primates and is capable of 3' flanking sequence transcluction during retrotransposition. In this study, we examined all of the full-length SVA elements in the human genome to assess the frequency and impact of SVA-mediated 3' sequence transcluction. Our results showed that approximate to 53 kb of genomic sequences have been duplicated by 143 different SVA-mediated transcluction events. In particular, we identified one group of SVA elements that duplicated the entire AMAC gene three times in the human genome through SVA-mediated transcluction events, which happened before the divergence of humans and African great apes. In addition to the original AMAC gene, the three transduced AMAC copies contain intact ORFs in the human genome, and at least two are actively transcribed in different human tissues. The duplication of entire genes and the creation of previously unclescribed gene families through retrotransposon-mediated sequence transcluction represent an important mechanism by which mobile elements impact their host genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available