4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Raman scattering study of calcium hexaboride

Journal

VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 288-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2006.05.003

Keywords

Raman scattering; hexaboride; CaB(6); magnetic semiconductor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report significant difference in the Raman spectra of two different kinds of CaB(6) single crystals grown from boron purity 99.9% (3N) or 99.9999% (6N), respectively. Our Raman spectra of CaB(6) (3N), which are similar to those of previous measurement [N. Ogita, S. Nagai, N. Okamoto, M. Udagawa, F. Iga, M. Sera, J. Akimitsu, S. Kunii, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 224305], show peaks at 781.3 cm(-1) (T(2g)), 1140.1 cm(-1) (E(g)), and 1283.5 cm(-1) (A(1g)). The E(g) mode shows a characteristic double-peak feature due to an additional weak broad peak centered at 1156.0 cm(-1). However, the Raman spectra of Ca(B)6 (6N) show sharp peaks at 772.5 cm(-1) (T(2g)), 1137.9 cm(-1) (E(g)), and 1266.6 cm(-1) (A(1g)). The peak frequencies are down shifted as much as 17 cm(-1). In addition, no additional peak feature is observed for the E(g) mode so that the mode is symmetric in the case of CaB6 (6N). The X-ray powder diffraction patterns for both CaB(6) (3N) and CaB(6) (6N) show that the lattice parameters are essentially the same. The majority of the impurity in the 99.9% (3N) boron is assessed to be C. Thus we prepared Ca(B(0.995)C(0.005))(6), CaB(6) (6N) doped with C, and looked for the difference in the Raman spectra. The Raman spectra of Ca(B(0.995)C(0.005))(6) are nearly identical to those of CaB(6) (6N), indicating that the difference in the Raman spectra of CaB(6) (3N) and CaB(6) (6N) is not due to C impurity. However, presence of impurity, even if small amount, seems to be enough to trigger local-structure changes to lower symmetry inducing the difference in Raman spectra of CaB(6) (3N) and CaB(6) (6N). (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available