4.5 Article

Microarray analysis of gene expression during early stages of mild and severe cardiac hypertrophy

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 309-317

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00072.2006

Keywords

tropomyosin; cardiomyopathy; familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations; microarray

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-71952] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) is a disease characterized by ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, and aberrant systolic and/or diastolic function. We previously developed two transgenic mouse models that carry FHC-associated mutations in alpha-tropomyosin (TM): FHC alpha-TM175 mice show patchy areas of mild ventricular disorganization and limited hypertrophy, whereas FHC alpha-TM180 mice exhibit severe hypertrophy and fibrosis and die within 6 mo. To obtain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with the early onset of cardiac hypertrophy, we conducted a detailed comparative analysis of gene expression in 2.5-mo-old control, FHC alpha-TM175, and alpha-TM180 ventricular tissue. Results show that 754 genes (from a total of 22,600) were differentially expressed between the nontransgenic (NTG) and the FHC hearts. There are 178 differentially regulated genes between NTG and the FHC alpha-TM175 hearts, 388 genes are differentially expressed between NTG and FHC alpha-TM180 hearts, and 266 genes are differentially expressed between FHC alpha-TM175 and FHC alpha-TM180 hearts. Genes that exhibit the largest increase in expression belong to the secreted/extracellular matrix category, and those with the most significant decrease in expression are associated with metabolic enzymes. Confirmation of the microarray analysis was conducted by quantitative real-time PCR on gene transcripts commonly associated with cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available