4.0 Article

Low micronutrient levels as a predictor of incident disability in older women

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 166, Issue 21, Pages 2335-2340

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2335

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000722] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI41956, R01 AI041956] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIA NIH HHS [N01-AG12112, R01 AG011703, R01 AG027012, R01 AG11703-01A1, R37 AG019905, N01 AG012112] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The role of nutritional status in the disablement process is still unclear. The objective of this study was to assess whether low concentrations of nutrients predict the development and course of disability. Methods: Longitudinal study including community-dwelling women 65 years or older enrolled in the Women's Health and Aging Study I. In total, 643 women were assessed prospectively at 6-month intervals from 1992 to 1995. Results: Incidence rates of disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) during 3 years of follow-up. Incidence rates in the lowest quartile of each selected nutrient were compared with those in the upper quartiles. The hazard ratios were estimated from Cox models adjusted for potential confounders. Women in the lowest quartile of serum concentrations of vitamin B-6 ( hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.67), vitamin B-12 ( HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), and selenium ( HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.12-1.71) had significantly higher risk of disability in ADLs during 3 years of follow-up compared with women in the upper 3 quartiles. Conclusions: Low serum concentrations of vitamins B6 and B12 and selenium predict subsequent disability in ADLs in older women living in the community. Nutritional status is one of the key factors to be considered in the development of strategies aimed at preventing or delaying the disablement process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available