4.7 Article

Work disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: higher rates but better clinical status in Finland compared with the US

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 65, Issue 12, Pages 1653-1657

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.048439

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL067964, HL67964] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To analyse and compare work disability attributed to rheumatoid arthritis in two cohorts of patients with early disease: one in the US and the other in Finland. Patients and methods: Two cohorts of patients who were working and aged,65 years at the time of their first symptom of rheumatoid arthritis were studied: 269 patients in Nashville, TN, USA (median age 46 years, 72.5% females), and 364 patients from Jyvaskyla, Finland, (median age 47.1 years, 70.9% females). The cohorts were analysed and compared for measures of clinical status and work disability status over a median (interquartile range) of 38.9 months in Nashville and 48.4 months in Jyvaskyla. Results: The probability of working at 36 months was 0.89 (0.84 -0.92) for patients from Nashville and 0.84 (0.80 -0.88) for patients from Jyvaskyla (p = 0.02). These rates were lower than in earlier decades. Patients from Jyvaskyla had significantly higher rates of work disability (p = 0.02) than those from Nashville, but better scores for self-report physical function (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001) and global status (p, 0.001) at last observation. The likelihood of being disabled from work was 2.6-fold higher in Jyvaskyla compared to Nashville (95% confidence interval 1.44 to 4.59, p = 0.001), after adjustment for demographic and disease-specific variables. Conclusion: Rates of work disability in both early rheumatoid arthritis cohorts were improved from earlier decades, but differed significantly in two different social systems. Higher work disability rates with better clinical status was seen in the Finnish early rheumatoid arthritis cohort than in the US cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available