4.7 Article

Evolution of giant planets in eccentric disks

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 652, Issue 2, Pages 1698-1714

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/508451

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; hydrodynamics; methods : numerical planetary; systems : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the interaction between a giant planet and a viscous circumstellar disk by means of high-resolution, two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations. We consider planetary masses that range from 1 to 3 Jupiter masses (M-J) and initial orbital eccentricities that range from 0 to 0.4. We find that a planet can cause eccentricity growth in a disk region adjacent to the planet's orbit, even if the planet's orbit is circular. Disk-planet interactions lead to growth in a planet's orbital eccentricity. The orbital eccentricities of a 2M(J) and a 3M(J) planet increase from 0 to 0.11 within about 3000 orbits. Over a similar time period, the orbital eccentricity of a 1M(J) planet grows from 0 to 0.02. For a case of a 1MJ planet with an initial eccentricity of 0.01, the orbital eccentricity grows to 0.09 over 4000 orbits. Radial migration is directed inward but slows considerably as a planet's orbit becomes eccentric. If a planet's orbital eccentricity becomes sufficiently large, e greater than or similar to 0.2, migration can reverse and so be directed outward. The accretion rate toward a planet depends on both the disk and the planetary orbital eccentricity and is pulsed over the orbital period. Planetary mass growth rates increase with planetary orbital eccentricity. For e similar to 0.2, the mass growth rate of a planet increases by similar to 30% above the value for e = 0. For e greater than or similar to 0.1, most of the accretion within the planet's Roche lobe occurs when the planet is near the apocenter. Similar accretion modulation occurs for flow at the inner disk boundary, which represents accretion toward the star.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available