4.5 Article

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections on a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit: are the sick getting sicker?

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 813-819

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705530

Keywords

vancomycin-resistant enterococcus; blood-stream infection; transplantation; leukemia; mortality

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [1W01C000333-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at high risk for bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI) owing to resistant organisms. Data describing the outcomes of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) BSI in this patient population are limited. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all cases of VRE BSI that occured between February 1996 and December 2002 on the Leukemia/HSCT unit at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. There were 68 episodes of VRE BSI in 60 patients with acute (53%) or chronic (8%) leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (22%) or other malignant hematologic disorders (17%). A total of 13, 32 and 32% were recipients of autologous, related and matched-unrelated transplants, respectively. Forty-two of allograft recipients had active acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 32% chronic GVHD. Only 57% were neutropenic, 52% had refractory/relapsed malignancy and 60% had end organ dysfunction with a median APACHE II score of 17. Median survival after VRE BSI was 19 days. Pneumonia, receipt of anti-fungal drugs and low APACHE II score at the time of the VRE BSI remained significant risk factors for death on multivariable analysis. Our analysis suggests that in patients with hematological malignancies or HSCT, VRE may not have the behavior of a virulent pathogen. VRE BSI may simply be a marker of these patients' already existing critical medical condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available