4.3 Article

Differing immunogenic potentials of interferon beta preparations in multiple sclerosis patients

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 731-737

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458506070941

Keywords

antibody titer; IFN beta-1a; IFN beta-1b; myxovirus A bioassay; neutralizing antibodies; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

interferon beta (IFN beta) is a first-line therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, some patients experience a decline in efficacy with continued therapy due to the development of anti-IFN beta neutralizing antibodies (NAb). We investigated the frequency of NAb cross-sectionally in 846 MS patients who were receiving IFN beta-1b, IFN beta-1a im, or IFN beta-1a sc. The frequency of NAb in patients receiving IFN beta-1a im was lower (5%) than in patients treated with any other form of IFN beta (22-35%) (P < 0.0001). Binding antibodies (BAb) were measured in 808 patients. The frequency differed significantly between treatment groups, ranging from 45% (IFN beta-1a im) to 88% (IFN beta-1b). The proportion of NAb-positive patients within the BAb-positive group differed significantly among treatment groups, ranging between 12% (IFN beta-1a im) and 51% (IFN beta-1a sc). The median NAb titer from all IFN beta-1a-treated patients was higher than from IFN beta-1b-treated patients (446 versus 171 NU/mL, P=0.04). Among NAb-positive patients, the frequency of NAb titers > 100 NU/mL was 71% for IFN beta-1a compared with 58% for IFN beta-1b (P=0.04). Except for conflicting data regarding IFN beta-1a sc, the results are generally consistent with the literature and together with the differing proportion of NAb-positive patients within the BAb-positive group, provide further insight into the immunogenicity of the IFN beta preparations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available