4.5 Article

Complete genome analysis of RFLP 184 isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Journal

VIRUS RESEARCH
Volume 122, Issue 1-2, Pages 175-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.06.003

Keywords

nidovirus; PRRSV; deletion; non-structural protein (nsp); MN184; PRRSV database

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two full-length genomes of recently emerged virulent isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) were sequenced and compared to other PRRSV strains. The results revealed that these two isolates (named MN 184), of North American lineage, represented the shortest PRRSV genomes sequenced to date with a nucleotide length of 15019 bases. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the two isolates were not identical and shared approximately 87 and 59% nucleotide identity with prototype North American strain VR-2332 and European strain Lelystad, respectively. Three quite variable regions were identified, corresponding to putative nsp1 beta, putative nsp2 and ORF5. Nsp2, the most variable region, shared only 66-70% amino acid similarity to other sequenced North American-like PRRSV nsp2 proteins. Further study revealed that the nsp2 protein of the MN 184 isolates contained three discontinuous deletions when compared to strain VR-2332 nsp2 protein, with the sizes of 111, 1, and 19 amino acids corresponding to strain VR-2332 positions 324-434, 486 and 505-523, respectively. The results suggest that targeted manipulation of PRRSV through nsp2 modification by reverse genetics may yield promising vectors for vaccine development, as has been recently demonstrated [Han, J., Faaberg, K.S., Wang, Y., Liu, H., 2005. Non-structural protein 2 mutants of PRRSV strain VR-2332 infectious clone based on deletions seen in RFLP 184 isolates are viable. In: PRRS International Symposium Proceedings, vol. 8, Saint Louis, MO]. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available