4.7 Article

Action or inaction? Decision making in patients with diabetes and elevated blood pressure in primary care

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 2580-2585

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1124

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - Hypertension increases micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes. The goal for blood pressure is < 130/80 mmHg. In primary care, however, blood pressure in many patients exceeds this goal. In this study, we evaluated the clinical decision-making process when a patient with diabetes presents with elevated blood pressure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twenty-six primary care practices in two practice-based research networks in Colorado participated. Questionnaires were completed after each encounter with an adult with type 2 diabetes. Data obtained from the survey included 1) demographic information, 2) blood pressure results, 3) action taken, 4) type of action if action was taken, and 5) reasons for inaction if action was not taken. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of action. RESULTS - Completed surveys totaled 778. Blood pressure was 130/74 +/- 18.8/12.0 mmHg (mean SD). Sixty-two percent of patients exceeded goals. Action was taken to lower blood pressure in 34.9% of those. Predictors of action were 1) blood pressure level, 2) total number of medicines the patient was taking, and 3) patient already taking medicines for blood pressure. As blood pressure rose, providers attributed inaction more often to competing demands and reasons other than blood pressure being at or near goal. CONCLUSIONS - No evidence was found for patterns of poor care among primary care physicians. Providers balance the clinical circumstances, including how elevated the blood pressure is, and issues of polypharmacy, medication side effects, and costs when determining the best course of action. Knowledge deficit is not a common cause of inaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available