4.5 Article

Inhibition of nitrification alters carbon turnover in the Patagonian steppe

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 1257-1265

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-005-0039-0

Keywords

carbon cycling; nitrification inhibition; nitrogen mineralization; semi-arid ecosystem; ammonium; nitrate; N-15 stable isotope; Patagonian steppe; Argentina; nitrapyrin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human activities are altering biodiversity and the nitrogen (N) cycle, affecting terrestrial carbon (C) cycling globally. Only a few specialized bacteria carry out nitrification-the transformation of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3-), in terrestrial ecosystems, which determines the form and mobility of inorganic N in soils. However, the control of nitrification on C cycling in natural ecosystems is poorly understood. In an ecosystem experiment in the Patagonian steppe, we inhibited autotrophic nitrification and measured its effects on C and N cycling. Decreased net nitrification increased total mineral N and NH4+ and reduced NO3+ in the soil. Plant cover (P < 0.05) and decomposition (P < 0.0001) decreased with inhibition of nitrification, in spite of increases in NH4+ availability. There were significant changes in the natural abundance of delta N-15 in the dominant vegetation when nitrification was inhibited suggesting that a switch occurred in the form of N (from NO3- to NH4+) taken up by plants. Results from a controlled-condition experiment supported the field results by showing that the dominant plant species of the Patagonian steppe have a marked preference for nitrate. Our results indicate that nitrifying bacteria exert a major control on ecosystem functioning, and that the inhibition of nitrification results in significant alteration of the C cycle. The interactions between the C and N cycles suggest that rates of C cycling are affected not just by the amount of available N, but also by the relative availability for plant uptake of NH4+ and NO3-.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available