4.6 Article

Fabrication and gas sensing properties of Ni-doped gamma-Fe2O3 by anhydrous solvent method

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 60, Issue 28, Pages 3315-3318

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.112

Keywords

iron oxide nanopowder; anhydrous solvent method; dope; gas sensing property; sensitivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ni-doped and undoped gamma-Fe2O3 nanopowders have been synthesized by anhydrous solvent method, using lauryl alcohol as anhydrous medium. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron micrograph (TEM) have been employed to characterize the products. When the molar ratio of lauryl alcohol to iron nitrate was 1:2, the average crystalline size of the undoped gamma-Fe2O3 is determined to be about 7 nm, and the 15 mol% Ni-doped v-Fe2O3 calcined at 300 degrees C is about 17.5 nm, respectively. The rod-like products, 15 mol% Ni-doped gamma-Fe2O3 nanopowders with the length of similar to 140 nm and the width of similar to 13.3 nm, are observed by TEM. The sensing characteristics of the undoped and 15 mol% Ni-doped gamma-Fe2O3 nanopowders, such as sensitivity, selectivity, response-recovery time, and long-time stability were studied for the first time. The experimental results reveal that both the undoped and the 15 mol% Ni-doped gamma-Fe2O3 sensors exhibit good sensitivity to acetone and ethanol, whereas poor sensitivity to petrol, CH4, H-2, and CO at working temperature of 240 and 270 degrees C, respectively. Compared with the undoped sensor, the 15 mol% Ni-doped gamma-Fe2O3 sensor presents higher sensitivity, shorter response-recovery time and better long-time stability, indicating that it might be a promising sensor for detecting acetone and ethanol gases. At the same time, it also suggests that the synthesis method and doping conditions can profoundly influence the morphology as well as the gas sensing properties of the sensors. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available