4.7 Article

A computational genomics approach to identify cis-regulatory modules from chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray data -: A case study using E2F1

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 1585-1595

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.5520206

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA45250] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG003129, R01 HG003129] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R56 DK067889, DK067889, R01 DK067889] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advances in high-throughput technologies, such as ChIP-chip, and the completion of human and mouse genomic sequences now allow analysis of the mechanisms of gene regulation on a systems level. In this study, we have developed a computational genomics approach (termed ChIPModules), which begins with experimentally determined binding sites and integrates positional weight matrices constructed from transcription factor binding sites, a comparative genomics approach, and statistical learning methods to identify transcriptional regulatory modules. We began with E2F1 binding site information obtained from ChIP-chip analyses of ENCODE regions, from both HeLa and MCF7 cells. Our approach not only distinguished targets from nontargets with a high specificity, but it also identified five regulatory modules for E2F1. One of the identified modules predicted a colocalization of E2F1 and AP-2 alpha on a set of target promoters with an intersite distance of < 270 bp. We tested this prediction using ChIP-chip assays with arrays containing similar to 14,000 human promoters. We found that both E2F1 and AP- 2 alpha bind within the predicted distance to a large number of human promoters, demonstrating the strength of our sequence-based, unbiased, and universal protocol. Finally, we have used our ChIPModules approach to develop a database that includes thousands of computationally identified and/or experimentally verified E2F1 target promoters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available