4.6 Article

Does the existence of bird's nest ferns enhance the diversity of oribatid (Acari: Oribatida) communities in a subtropical forest?

Journal

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages 4533-4553

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-5443-4

Keywords

alpha-diversity; Asplenium nidus; beta-diversity; gamma-diversity; species accumulation curve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effects of the presence of bird's nest ferns on the species diversity of oribatid mites in the whole forest in terms of the three categories of species diversity (alpha-, beta-, and gamma-diversity) in a subtropical forest in south-western Japan. The species diversity (1 - D) of oribatid communities in the ferns was significantly lower than those in bark of trees and the forest-floor litter and soil, and was similar to that in the branches. The oribatid faunas in the litter in and the roots of the fern were more similar to those in both the forest-floor litter and soil than to the faunas in the other arboreal habitats. However, the ferns can be colonized by endemic oribatid species specialized to such environments. The number of oribatid species estimated for a hypothetical stand with no ferns was about 180 species from 80 samples; this value did not differ significantly from that in another hypothetical stand with ferns (ca. 190 species). Thus, the species richness of oribatid communities estimated for the whole forest (the gamma-diversity) was not affected by the presence or absence of bird's nest ferns. The alpha- and beta-diversities of oribatid communities on bird's nest ferns were lower than those in other habitats, and they might not dramatically raise the overall gamma-diversity of invertebrate communities in the whole forest. The bird's nest ferns, however, can generate a unique habitat for specialized species, and this would help to maintain species diversities of invertebrates at the whole-forest scale in subtropical forests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available