4.6 Article

RGC sensitivity to mild systemic hypoxia

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 5423-5427

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0602

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. Systemic hyperoxia, hypercapnia, and hypoxia are known to alter retinal perfusion. The effects such experimentally induced systemic blood gas perturbations have on inner neuroretinal function in humans were examined. METHODS. Twenty healthy adults participated in each of three test sessions. The effects of breathing pure oxygen (O-2), carbogen, or a hypoxic gas on the pattern electroretinogram (pERG) were investigated. The stimulus consisted of high-contrast, black-and-white, 48-min arc checks reversing at 1 Hz. pERGs were recorded with a Dawson-Trick-Litzkow electrode at the end of 5 minutes of breathing room air, 5 minutes of breathing the test gas, immediately after the flow of gas was stopped, and 10 minutes after the flow of gas was stopped. RESULTS. Amplitudes and implicit times of the major positive (P50) and negative (N95) components of the pERG were not altered during the pure O-2 and carbogen breathing sessions. Although the amplitude and implicit time of P50 were not modified significantly with systemic hypoxia, they were depressed and delayed, respectively, for N95. CONCLUSIONS. Inner neuroretinal function remained unchanged during increased blood O-2 and carbon dioxide levels known to alter retinal blood flow, but it was altered during decreased blood O-2 levels. Overall, these results indicate that the generators of P50 are resistant to systemic hyperoxia, hypercapnia/hyperoxia, and hypoxia. They further indicate that the generators of N95, namely the retinal ganglion cells, are particularly sensitive to transient, mild systemic hypoxia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available