4.4 Article

The effects of preservation on fish tissue stable isotope signatures

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 1595-1611

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01226.x

Keywords

Arctic charr; food webs; lipid extraction; lipids; preservation effects; stable isotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of formalin and ethanol preservation on the delta C-13 and delta N-15 isotope signatures of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus muscle tissue were examined. The lipid content of the tissue samples studied ranged from 3.6 to 6.1% and was not correlated with the magnitude of observed isotopic shifts in preserved samples. Ethanol and formalin significantly depleted and enriched, respectively, the delta C-13 isotope signatures of preserved tissues when compared to control samples. Ethanol did not significantly enrich delta N-15 signatures in comparison to controls, whereas formalin did. A meta-analysis of multiple species effects further demonstrated significant preservation effects in fish tissue. Statistical analysis of data obtained by correcting preserved tissue isotope signatures with literature, bootstrapped or meta-analysis derived correction factors demonstrated significant differences between corrected and control sample isotope signatures or failure to produce a unity slope when the data sets were regressed against one another. Species-specific, bootstrapped linear correction models resulted in no such errors. Results suggest that species-specific correction methods should be used for fishes because of the known wide variation in fish tissue lipid content and composition. Accordingly, the use of pilot studies will be required to develop correction factors that properly adjust for preservation effects when interpreting temporal patterns in historic analyses of food webs. (c) 2006 The Authors Journal compilation (c) 2006 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available