4.5 Article

Catabolism of adenine nucleotides favors adenosine production following exercise in patients with chronic heart failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 720-725

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.08.215

Keywords

adenosine; ammonia; purines; heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adenosine 5-triphosphate is catabolized to adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP), which is further degraded by 2 pathways: deamination to inosine 5'-monophosphate and ammonia by AMP deaminase, or dephosphorylation to adenosine and inorganic phosphate by 5'-nucleotidase. Because adenosine is believed to be cardioprotective and we have reported that ammonia production decreased after exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), we determined if plasma adenosine levels after exercise increases in patients with CHF. Methods and Results: Maximal ergometer exercise tests with expired gas analysis were performed in 51 patients with CHF (age = 61 +/- 2 years, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class I/II/III = 19/18/14) and 20 age-matched normal controls. Serial changes in both plasma ammonia and adenosine levels were determined. The ratio for Delta ammonia to peak work rate became smaller (control, NYHA I/II/III: 0.59 0.13/0.41 +/- 0.06/0.37 +/- 0.10/0.22 +/- 0.11 mu g/dL . watts, respectively) and the ratio for Delta adenosine to peak work rate was significantly higher in class III CHF (control, NYHA I/II/III: 0.93 +/- 0.21/0.86 +/- 0.14/1.11 +/- 0.27/2.92 +/- 0.67 nmol/L.watts, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with CHF after exercise, the plasma levels of adenosine increased along with the decrease in the plasma levels of ammonia. Considering the physiologic cardioprotective actions of adenosine, the enhanced adenosine production after exercise may be an important adaptive response in patients with CHF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available