4.7 Article

Variability in RF-induced heating of a deep brain stimulation implant across MR systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1236-1242

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20769

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging, bioeffects; magnetic resonance imaging, safety; neurostimulation systems; implants; deep brain stimulation; specific absorption rate

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS44575-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare the MRI-related heating per unit of specific absorption rate (SAR) profile of a conductive implant between two 1.5-Tesla/64 MHz MR systems using a transmit/receive (t/r) head coil configuration. Materials and Methods: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads were configured within a gel-filled phantom of the human head and torso. Temperature variation at each of four contacts of the bilaterally-placed leads was monitored using fluoroptic thermometry. MRI was performed using the t/r head coils of two different-generation 1.5-Tesla MR systems from the same manufacturer. Temperature changes were normalized to SAR values for the head (Delta T/SAR-H), and the slope of this Delta T/SAR-H by time relationship was compared between the two scanners. Results: The Delta T/SAR-H for the implant ranged from 3.5 to 5.5 times higher on one MR system as compared to the other (P < 0.01) depending on the measurement site. Conclusion: The findings support previous observations that console-reported SAR does not constitute a reliable index of heating for elongated, conductive implants, such as the DBS hardware system tested. In contrast to our previous findings using a t/r body coil, the data presented here reveal marked differences between two MR systems using t/r head coils (the coil configuration was consistent with the implant manufacturer's imaging guidelines).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available