4.4 Article

Identification of basolateral amygdala projection cells and interneurons using extracellular recordings

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 3257-3265

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00577.2006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [1F31 MH 076415-01, R01 MH 073610-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested whether firing rate and spike shape could be used to distinguish projection cells from interneurons in extracellular recordings of basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons. To this end, we recorded BLA neurons in isoflurane-anesthetized animals with tungsten microelectrodes. Projection cells were identified by antidromic activation from cortical projection sites of the BLA. Although most projection cells fired spontaneously at low rates (< 1 Hz), an important subset fired at higher rates (up to 6.8 Hz). In fact, the distribution of firing rates in projection cells and unidentified BLA neurons overlapped extensively, even though the latter cell group presumably contains a higher proportion of interneurons. The only difference between the two distributions was a small subset (5.1%) of unidentified neurons with unusually high firing rates (9-16 Hz). Similarly, distributions of spike durations in both cell groups were indistinguishable, although most of the fast-firing neurons had spike durations at the low end of the distribution. However, we observed that spike durations depended on the exact position of the electrode with respect to the recorded cell, varying by as much as 0.7 ms. Thus neither firing rate nor spike waveform allowed for unequivocal separation of projection cells from interneurons. Nevertheless, we propose the use of two firing rate cutoffs to obtain relatively pure samples of projection cells and interneurons: <= 1 Hz for projection cells and >= 7 Hz for fast- spiking interneurons. Supplemented with spike-duration cutoffs of >= 0.7 ms for projection cells and <= 0.5 ms for interneurons, this approach should keep instances of misclassifications to a minimum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available