4.6 Article

KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors:: A comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 883-887

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.029

Keywords

BRAF; K-RAS; ovarian carcinoma; borderline tumor; implant; PCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Mutations of BRAF, a downstream mediator of K-RAS, have been described in serous borderline tumors of the ovary. Data concerning other types of ovarian tumors are scarce. Therefore, we assessed KRAS and BRAF mutation in a series of more than 100 different ovarian tumors. Methods. Paraffin-embedded material, including invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors, benign lesions and implants, was used. BRAF codon 600 in exon 15 and K-RAS codon 12 in exon 2 were analysed. Results. 92 cases (92%), including all serous carcinomas (100%), did not show a mutation of BRAF. Eight cases (8.0%), including five serous borderline tumors (31.25%), contained a mutation. In all serous borderline tumors, codon 600 was affected. The remaining three cases were invasive carcinomas of endometrioid (mutation on codon 600), mucinous (mutation on codon 600) and clear cell (mutation on codon 615) subtype. There was no BRAF mutation in mucinous borderline tumors. Regarding K-RAS, 89 cases (87.25%) did not show an aberration. The 11 positive borderline tumors (10.7%) were of serous (22.2%) and of mucinous type (46.6%). There was a KRAS mutation in a serous and a mucinous invasive carcinoma each. BRAF and K-RAS mutations were mutually exclusive and not seen in implants. Conclusion. Mutation of either K-RAS or BRAF is frequent in borderline tumors but is not found in invasive serous carcinomas and is very rare in other invasive subtypes. This supports the notion of different pathological pathways. For the development of extraovarian implants, further studies are observed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available